That precipitates a civil war which really doesn't end until almost 14 years after Caesar's death (he dies in 44). It turns out to be an *exceptionally* bad time, for everyone. 17/xx
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Almost every Roman prominent at the time of Caesar's crossing of the Rubicon in 49 is dead by the end of the conflict in 31, nearly all of them dying violently. While Caesar himself makes a great show of his clemency (he even prints it on coins)...18/xx
1 vastaus 3 uudelleentwiittausta 152 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
...and tends to pardon captured opponents, a lot of his enemies - Gnaeus Pompey, Cato the Younger, Metellus Scipio, etc. are either killed in battle, commit suicide rather than be captured, or (in Pompey's case) are assassinated (in a misguided effort to curry favor). 19/xx
1 vastaus 3 uudelleentwiittausta 130 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
But Caesar makes effectively no plans on how to institutionalize his rule on victory - he instead ends up offending the senate and too openly toys with being king (Seut. Caes. 79; Plut. Caes. 61), which leads to his assassination. 20/xx
1 vastaus 3 uudelleentwiittausta 135 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
To be clear, Caesar was fairly popular, but Caesar being king was not - the crowds cheered when he made a show of refusing the crown (one rather assumes, given the episode, he had wanted them to cheer that he accept it, but they did not, Plut. Caes. 61.5-10). 21/xx
2 vastausta 6 uudelleentwiittausta 141 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
In power as dictator, then dictator perpetuo (dictator-forever) Caesar did a lot of stuff, though it is hard to say he had a coherent political program. He mostly did what was popular in order to maintain his evidently fragile position. 22/xx
2 vastausta 4 uudelleentwiittausta 141 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
What he most certainly didn't do was put Rome on a firm foundation. Upon his assassination in 44, his lieutenants, pardoned foes, former friends and his own adopted son Octavian promptly set in to murdering each other in a 14-year-long bloodbath. 23/xx
1 vastaus 8 uudelleentwiittausta 159 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
It's hard to really describe in brief just how traumatic this all was to the Romans, but you get a sense of it by the way the people of Rome absolutely *panic* whenever they think Octavian might die or give up power. The fear of the bad old days of civil war was intense. 24/xx
1 vastaus 4 uudelleentwiittausta 167 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
So there it is, Julius Caesar - bloody and lawless, an almost entirely negative presence in Roman history. It would be up to his nephew to try to put Rome back together after Caesar's pride and ego shoved it into the abyss. 25/xx
3 vastausta 13 uudelleentwiittausta 205 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
I believe someone called Octavian's "attempt" "making a desert, and calling it peace."
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
This is actually a quote by Tacitus, probably made up by him, put in the mouth of the British Caledonian leader Calgacus, putatively in 83AD in the reign of Domitian.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.