Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Say better then that the right is the natural home of colonial defense and apologia and right-wingers who do not favor those things have no grounds for being surprised by that.
Again, I'll stipulate to a lot of colonial apologia on the right (and that's bad). But that doesn't seem unique - the Progressives could be pretty pro-imperial (e.g. Teddy Roosevelt) and hard-leftist regimes are often pretty OK with imperial adventures.
I think you could make an argument that the innate traditionalism of the right leads them to defend the status quo which in turn leads them to defend existing traditional imperial structures, but that seems like a much weaker form of the argument here.
I don't think it's that much weaker, I think it's something like the essence of the matter. Colonial hierarchies are among the regimes of property whose defense is a defining feature of right-wing politics.
If you're expecting that I'll stipulate to Teddy Roosevelt being a leftist, I certainly will not!
Er - government regulation, national parks, anti-trust action, pro-labor laws as part of the Square Deal, government food inspection and (for the time) pro-union policies? A definition of the left which doesn't include that is narrow indeed, I'd think?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
