Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
The reason it's the most successful action franchise AND the reason it stars somebody called "Captain America" both have nothing meaningful to do with freedom and everything to do with hegemony.
I tend to disagree. Clearly, hegemony plays a role, but the USSR was plenty hegemonic, put tremendous effort into that kind of cultural production and couldn't make it stick. Now the PRC is doing the same and so far the best of it is apparently Wolf Warrior.
It seems fair to posit that individuals w/ a higher degree of personal freedom tend to produce cultural products which become more widespread. I won't say 'better' because there is often great art by oppressed people, but the nature of oppression prevents it being widespread.
The follow on consequence, that societies which have relatively more individuals in conditions of relatively higher degrees of personal freedom will tend to be more culturally prominent than their raw population or GDP would suggest seems born out.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
