Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I find I view this differently. Free and prosperous societies produce cultural soft power organically, whereas authoritarian societies have to use state action. Sure, some of that organic production is corporate, some of it isn't and there are gradations in between.
But then again, I'll also take corporations, which don't care about you but also cannot legally shoot you or put you in a death camp, to state power - where state actors who *also* don't care about you can do both of those things.
I'm sorry, I reject this on several levels. First you're conflating cultural production - which happens in all human societies - with soft power projection - which happened for us in the 20th century because we were militarily and economically hegemonic.
Furthermore at the time that our cultural products became hegemonic the people who produced a huge percentage of them lived under a regime of legalized semislavery so I think we can safely rule out our freedom as an engine of creativity.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
