Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
That said, I'd much rather have a leader who recognizes their limits in times of extreme stress and maintains their mental health than the normal authoritarian model where the unstable leader has repeated mental breakdowns which are then converted into policy by their underlings.
Like, Eisenhower kept a regular sleep schedule, played bridge & badminton, took up (& abandoned) sketching to cope w/ the anxiety for D-Day. He slept through the first hours. Hitler stayed up late, took drugs & gave orders to imaginary units. Guess who won?
(Hitler of course also slept through the first few hours of D-Day). Every time I see these folks arguing that 'we need Many Men' to win whatever, they are invariably advocating self-defeating toxic BS rather than actual leadership.
Sigh at twitter's lack of an edit button, that should read, 'we need Manly Men' but I think you all get my point. Men are actually necessary for society. Machismo is not.
during the battle of midway spruance went off watch as normal and slept like a baby "i had good officers and i knew they would do their duty admirably," he said. "why should i not sleep?"
Stokesbury's A Short History of WWI has a similar comparison between Joffre and Molke the younger, the former taking his afternoon naps as normal and the later frenetically losing his mind during 1914. Again, no surprise who won.
Indeed, when Rabin first went into politics there were military colleagues who said his military conduct made him unfit. Why? Because in the '67 crisis he stayed awake and nicotine-poisoned when he should've been chilling and sleeping and waiting for the Big One to start.
Stalin.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
