Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
(I feel I should note that I haven't actually ever experienced rudeness or unprofessional comments from a peer reviewer or academic journal editor. So far my experiences with peer review, successful and unsuccessful, have been pretty good.)
So I am exaggerating for comedic effect. Nevertheless I think the contrast between editors who generally want to help you 'find' the final article (within reason) and academic editors and peer reviewers, who merely judge the final product as worthy or deficient, is marked.
At least in math, I've had some very good experiences with editors helping a lot with turning the final product into a well-written thing, after it has been approved by the referee. Not sure how normal that is.
Grading versus teaching/guiding?
An apt comparison, I think.
True. Though perhaps dependent on the field as well? I know we always received/were encouraged to suggest improvements in peer reviews. And IIRC, one of the statuses we could assign papers was "accept with improvements".
I spent 15 years administering US medical and UK civil engineering peer reviews. It can be a strange dynamic for authentic authors who don't fully understand that they're being vetted for gaming the system, yes. I really should write an article on it.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
