Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
One thing that comes to mind is the fact that a lot of the first states merged the role of king with that of high priest. Perhaps something similar goes on when a tyranny is reforged into a monarchy as when states emerged before there was any state tradition at all?
Kingship functionally always features the king invested with some kind of religious power or significance. The way I teach it, kingship is defined by three jobs across cultures: chief general, chief judge, chief priest. True for ancient Mesopotamia as much as for Queen Bess II.
Oh, absolutely. I’m thinking in particular though of how many early states explicitly asserted the king to be a demigod (or even a full god), whereas Elizabeth II is merely head of the church.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
