Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Consequently, I'd contend that while there are a lot of ways to group people, for that grouping to be a nation, the myth of common origin - in particular the myth of a common *birth* origin is non-option. Other groupings are no less real, but they're not nations.
Looking at the emergence of nationalism in Europe in the 18th-19th cent., the primacy of an imagined common genetic origin was central to the idea and no one was particularly subtle about it. I talk about that a bit here: https://acoup.blog/2020/02/14/collections-the-fremen-mirage-part-iiib-myths-of-the-atreides/ … in pursuit of a larger point.
Note that this was absolutely not true in the genesis of Irish nationalism. Tone, McCracken and many of the other leaders of the United Irishmen were presbyterians who arrived with the plantation of Ulster, and did not make a particular attempt to hide this.
I am mistaken - Tone was a French protestant descended Anglican. Which I suspect, makes my point even better :-)
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
