Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
A nation can, but doesn’t have to have a shared ethnicity.
As I note in the essay, the word nation literally comes from 'natio' meaning birth via Old French nacion, meaning 'birth.' A notion of shared birth-origin is the root meaning of the word.
Consequently, I'd contend that while there are a lot of ways to group people, for that grouping to be a nation, the myth of common origin - in particular the myth of a common *birth* origin is non-option. Other groupings are no less real, but they're not nations.
Looking at the emergence of nationalism in Europe in the 18th-19th cent., the primacy of an imagined common genetic origin was central to the idea and no one was particularly subtle about it. I talk about that a bit here: https://acoup.blog/2020/02/14/collections-the-fremen-mirage-part-iiib-myths-of-the-atreides/ … in pursuit of a larger point.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
