Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
And by the way, if *any* officers haven't read Mao, they need to fix that! His theories are important, current insurgent and guerilla fighters model their strategies off of those theories. I'd be bothered if Milley hadn't read Mao!
The same goes for Marx, Lenin and, *yes* the dreaded CRT ::cue Isengard theme:: Even if you think those theories are garbage, ideas matter in strategic contexts and so you need to understand them. Which means reading. Book learnin' is for winners, son.
This isn't a new idea either: Fas est et ab hoste doceri, "It is right to learn, even from an enemy" (Ovid, Met. 4.428). Or, of course, "If you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles" (Sun Tzu, Art of War ch3)
Anyway, war is serious business that requires serious thought, not some pecker-measuring masculinity contest (pardon my language) and if Carlson and Vance new the first thing about the topic, they'd know that.
CRT is an enemy ideology, perhaps, but not one that you need to be fighting as a military. (Unless you're in Army HR, in which case go nuts) But yes, you do have a point regarding Mao.
It took me an embarrassingly long time to figure out that CRT did *not* mean Cathode Ray Tubes in this context.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
