The exception to this rule is if you are doing something that aims to get attention for your other work or platform (e.g. you are using their audience). But then you want to be very sure that you are gesturing back in that to the project you want them to know about.
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Have an idea? Write a draft, polish it carefully, pitch it at the publication of your dreams. When they pass on it, drop down to the next choice until someone takes it. Now you have a byline. Amend your next pitch to note that your words have appeared in print at X.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 13 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Placing articles in mainstream media places is one of those things where the more bylines you have, the easier it is to get new bylines; another reason to start this stuff early (but don't do it for free because bylines by places that didn't pay you don't matter as much).
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 10 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
While you are doing this, be nice, prompt, and courteous, because the gold ticket is building a good working relationship with an editor at a solid publication. If you are a known, reliable quantity, it becomes much easier to land pieces.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 11 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
If you are building your own platform (like ACOUP)...uh...get really lucky? This advice is harder for me because I think there's a lot more alchemy than science here, so I can only speak to what I did.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 13 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
My strategy for ACOUP (where I hoped to perhaps have a few hundred regular readers, so...uh...mission accomplished, I guess?) had a few basic elements: 1) Write with posts appearing on a regular schedule so readers knew when to come back looking for new stuff.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 12 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
2) Conversational writing more akin to a written 100-level lecture than an 'essay.' Teaching experience can also help you get a sense of where the average person is in terms of subject knowledge, so you know where you need to start.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 12 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
3) Honey on the cup of wormwood (Lucretius, DRN 1.939-41) - always lead with the hook, where the hook is going to be some modern connection, either a modern work of pop culture or a modern assumption about the past.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 10 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
In retrospect, I didn't plan this, but if you can tap into an existing subculture, that can really help build an audience, because chances are those folks have their own forums and reddits where they share neat stuff.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 10 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
My initial audience came pretty heavily out of the fantasy literature community (esp. on Reddit) because I had used GoT and LOTR has some of my hooks. Then those folks evangelized my work to other people.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 14 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju
My final bit of advice is to be on Twitter and to curate a professional persona on Twitter. The public you want to reach isn't on twitter, but the journalists, editors, podcasters, etc. that you want to use to reach that public are.
-
-
Twitter is almost never a major driver of traffic on ACOUP (it's there, but in 26 months, twitter has been my top referrer in just 3 of them), but doing my public engagement history bit on twitter has gotten me opportunities to write elsewhere that were very good.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 14 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
I'm sure I'm forgetting things, but that's what comes to mind right now. By far, the biggest thing is to get out and start doing it.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 11 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.