Bret Devereaux

That goes for both style and content. Too many academics write for their colleagues and then wonder why no one will run their pieces or no one reads their blog or webzine. Interesting writing is an art, but one that can be practiced.

The next thing to think about is if you are aiming to use other people's platforms or build your own platform. If you are planning to publish on someone else's platform, *make*them*pay*you.*

Going rate for the bog standard 1,200 word think piece is around $300. Longer pieces pay more. Too many academics, esp. junior ones, make themselves free labor for magazines, etc. If you are building their platform, make them pay you.

The exception to this rule is if you are doing something that aims to get attention for your other work or platform (e.g. you are using their audience). But then you want to be very sure that you are gesturing back in that to the project you want them to know about.

Have an idea? Write a draft, polish it carefully, pitch it at the publication of your dreams. When they pass on it, drop down to the next choice until someone takes it. Now you have a byline. Amend your next pitch to note that your words have appeared in print at X.

Placing articles in mainstream media places is one of those things where the more bylines you have, the easier it is to get new bylines; another reason to start this stuff early (but don't do it for free because bylines by places that didn't pay you don't matter as much).

While you are doing this, be nice, prompt, and courteous, because the gold ticket is building a good working relationship with an editor at a solid publication. If you are a known, reliable quantity, it becomes much easier to land pieces.

If you are building your own platform (like ACOUP)...uh...get really lucky? This advice is harder for me because I think there's a lot more alchemy than science here, so I can only speak to what I did.