Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
So, here's a question: when your public scholarship comes up in an interview as an example of your academic activity (because public engagement matters) and you get asked "Do you monetize that?" ...how exactly are you supposed to respond?
I should note this is an honest question because I can never tell is the impetus behind that question is 1) raw curiosity that such a thing is possible or 2) highlight how unusually successful my public outreach project is or 3) an effort to shame me for making money off of it.
And I don't want to discount (1) there. Honestly, if grad student me met today's version of me, I think the first question I'd have for myself is, "wait, people give you money to write stuff? Like, a liveable amount of money?" with a tone of awe, confusion and reverence.
I dislike lying in principled, moral grounds, but I also dislike lying about things that can be disconfirmed with a brief google search on practical grounds too.
"god yes, working for free is for chumps & dilettantes"
But he's in academia, so that'd be something of a self-burn.
Does it involve moral rot?
I've not dealt with them pertaining to scholarship, but my first impulse is to ask a clarifying question.
my best guess is that they want you to answer 'yes' as proof that you are thinking about how to translate your outputs into capital.
(I am assuming you are being interviewed by an academic institution that is eager to monetize research findings both for the possible revenue stream and perceived credibility it brings)
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
