Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
You may have had a better argument if you were focused on, say, pederasty in Sparta or other examples with significant age/power/status differentials. But you opted to opine on an example of a group consisting of entirely consenting high status free adult citizen males.
It can hardly be surprising that historians are going to cry foul when you pick an example that runs against your argument and claim that it speaks for your point and everyone who disagrees is engaged in a 'lie.' It certainly doesn't speak to a strong mastery of the topic.
In any event, I don't find your core argument - that the normalization of modern homosexual relationships has led to the emotionally stunted modern model of straight masculinity - persuasive.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
