Lest we fix on that ἔνιοι δέ φασιν ('but some say'), Plutarch then goes on for a whole section about the benefits in cohesion offered by such an arrangement (complete with a requisite quote from Homer...because Plutarch)... 4/19
-
-
So the original tweet is simply wrong in a lazy, unambiguous way. There are interesting debates to be had over other questions, like if Achilles&Patroclus were intended to be lovers in the text of the Iliad, or the details of Greek attitudes towards homosexuality. 15/19
Näytä tämä ketju -
But this isn't one of those. Honestly, given how limited & often contradictory ancient source material is, how difficult archaeological evidence can be, it is a real challenge to manage to be decisively wrong on a point where there is no uncertainty. Mission accomplished? 16/19
Näytä tämä ketju -
So, summing up: it is the explicit - and to my knowledge unanimous - testimony of the sources that the Sacred Band did in fact consist of 150 matched pairs of male lovers. 17/19
Näytä tämä ketju -
And also, on no less authority than Philip II, King of the Macedonians, anyone who thinks that fact was disgraceful - presumably understood to include
@pegobry - can die in a fire (Plut. Pelop. 18.5) (He actually says ἀπόλοιντο κακῶς, "Let them perish horribly") 18/19Näytä tämä ketju -
If you want to read more about the Sacred Band,
@JamesRomm has literally *just* written a book about them. I haven't had a chance to read it (yet!!), but Romm won't steer you wrong, so give it a read. end/19https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/The-Sacred-Band/James-Romm/9781501198014 …Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.