Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
That has long been the assumption, codified by E. Badian, Publicans and Sinners (1972). But it has come under assault more recently and P. Erdkamp, "The Corn Supply of the Roman Armies" Historia 44.2 (1995) pretty much buries it.
Also on this check out Erdkamp, Hunger and the Sword (1998). Were the Publicani (businessmen filling public contracts) sometimes involved? Yes. But the evidence for large-scale involvement, even as we get into the late republic, is thin.
Certainly during the Middle Republic, we see a lot more supplies being moved by senatorial legates (who may themselves be contracting individuals ships, etc for the purpose). Caesar, for all his supply concerns, gives us evidence for just one private grain purchaser.
So private businessmen filling public contracts probably had some role - but a smaller and less important (and presumably less lucrative) one that has long been supposed.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
