Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Piling through Livy looking at his standard beginning-of-year passages, I do not know how the 'Romans didn't do strategy' limits-of-empire thesis survived editing. Sure, that argument is for the Empire...but do we assume the Romans just forgot how to do strategy in 31?
For those who haven't slogged through Livy 21-45, Livy begins pretty much every year with the allocation of provincia and other instructions by the Senate to various magistrates and while he doesn't usually relate the strategic concerns that motivate those decisions...
...it is very obvious that the Senate is making decisions balancing between various conflicts and theaters, coordinating resources with operational plans and making ends-and-means decisions. Which is to say strategy. (This chunk of Livy covers 218-166 BC)
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
