Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Would it actually have been necessary to make this decision? Prorogued officials did not reduce the number of officials elected that year - correct? - so wouldn't the newly-elected quaestors be spoken for in the usual way?
Exciting questions to which we do not know the answer. Polo and Fernandez imagine quaestors as being assigned to magistrates (by lot), so presumably the system would run more or less automatically in most years.
But, for instance, Erdkamp understands quaestors to have their own provincia and thus their own grant of authority entirely separate from the fellow with imperium - in that case, we'd have to imagine an active Senate role in the who-goes-where-does-what question.
I lean towards Erdkamp's reading, mostly because it seems like the kind of BS ad-hoc-ery that the Romans adore. Certainly we have some imperium-havers who go through more than one quaestor over long commands.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
