Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
So, Gaius Gracchus, for instance, serves two years as a quaestor in Spain. Sulla was Marius' quaestor for at least three years 107, 106 and 105.
We must assume - though I do not think we are told - that the Senate decided which quaestors to prorogue and which to replace with the new quaestors of the year, though Polo and Fernandez note that it seems like quaestors don't really ever serve longer than their imperium-havers.
Would it actually have been necessary to make this decision? Prorogued officials did not reduce the number of officials elected that year - correct? - so wouldn't the newly-elected quaestors be spoken for in the usual way?
Exciting questions to which we do not know the answer. Polo and Fernandez imagine quaestors as being assigned to magistrates (by lot), so presumably the system would run more or less automatically in most years.
In addition to handling the financial side of things, quaestors often get pulled by their imperium-haver to act as delegates or field commanders when necessary. Caesar does this a bunch.
It makes sense, since any quaestor has already done their 10-minimum years of military service and has probably been a military tribune during some of that, so they're likely to be at least modestly capable of small assignments.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
