Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
As the number of provinces increases, you end up with more imperium-havers than quaestors. What it seems like is happening, pre-Sulla, is that when a magistrate is prorogued (extended in command) his quaestor is as well.
So, Gaius Gracchus, for instance, serves two years as a quaestor in Spain. Sulla was Marius' quaestor for at least three years 107, 106 and 105.
We must assume - though I do not think we are told - that the Senate decided which quaestors to prorogue and which to replace with the new quaestors of the year, though Polo and Fernandez note that it seems like quaestors don't really ever serve longer than their imperium-havers.
Would it actually have been necessary to make this decision? Prorogued officials did not reduce the number of officials elected that year - correct? - so wouldn't the newly-elected quaestors be spoken for in the usual way?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
