(This question is addressed at some length in the recent F.P. Plp, A.D. Fernandez, The Quaestorship in the Roman Republic (2019), 25-42, 131-162.)
Näytä tämä ketju
I swear not a day goes by I do not learn some stupidly obvious thing I probably ought to have known years ago. Today's edition: Pro-quaestores, probably a thing. I always wondered because pre-Sulla it never seemed like there'd be enough quaestors. Well, there you go, I guess.
-
-
-
And then I typo the author's names. It's Francisco Pina *Polo* and Aljeandro Diaz Fernandez.
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Can you briefly sketch how this would have looked?
-
So each Roman magistrate or pro-magistrate with imperium (so Consuls, pro-consuls, praetors and pro-praetors) seems to get a quaestor assigned to them to handle the financial side of their commands (pay soldiers, buy supplies, etc). 2 more managed the main treasury in Rome
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.