So I'd still thinking about models A and B. And I think best with pictures. I'm really fine with either model, although B makes me more optimistic 1/?pic.twitter.com/J5cWepFYnK
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Looking at the models visually it really feels like the Classics experience I got is maybe even more heavily sequenced. Like, it's Gateway -> Languages -> Historical Training -> Specialty, to the point that ancient history training felt like a different step than languages.
My classics journey, in essence was: 1) Take Latin in high school 2) Undergrad history major who didn't know which history he wanted to do 3) Decide to do Roman, crash relearn Latin in undergrad 4) Post-Bacc year, more Latin learn Greek...
-
-
5) still not enough languages for grad study 6) MA in Classics dept. for 2 more years Latin and Greek 7) Still get rejected a ton from PhD programs 8) Third year hanging out in classics dept. getting more Latin and Greek 9) finally land a spot in an ancient history PHD
-
And of course 10) still feel massive imposter syndrome when around classics grad students (I did my PhD in a history dept.) with substantially more language training than me.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.