I'm not sure I see under what system classics - or any field of academic work - wouldn't have to make its case to *someone.* We don't farm our own food, we don't build our own buildings. We're going to need, at some point, to exchange our classics for someone else's bread.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
I'm a communist so I don't find this argument all that compelling. We're all companions on this Earth, so let's act like it and share the bread.
This strikes me as skipping a few steps. "I wish scarce resources would allocate themselves justly in the absence of systems for them to do so which have to be run by people making judgements on value" is a wish...not a program.
-
-
It's neither a wish nor a program. I know that people will cling to the idea that certain jobs are more valuable than others for many years to come, but I disagree with that idea.
-
So here is the issue - you have a system with limited resources, but people have unlimited wants. Who gets what? Who produces it? How is it delivered? And which wants don't get filled, because again - there are always more wants than resources to fill them.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.