Bret Devereaux

We're set to lose at least two important classics departments (UVM and Howard). How many more are on the chopping block at SLC that don't make national news? How many Latin programs? Folks, the Classics apocalypse (LBAC?) isn't coming - it's here. Troy is burning *now.* 10/16

Absolutely we need to be having discussions about the shape of the field we want to save - but we also need to save it for that to matter. It does us no good if we settle on a more inclusive classics which only survives in a handful of elite institutions and nowhere else. 11/16

So we've got to come out of our crumbling towers and meet the people where they are. If we're going to have a new, better classics, public outreach is the place to build it - not endless faculty debates. For better or for worse, the courses will have to follow demand. 12/16

To be clear, that doesn't mean we need necessarily more #ClassicsDiscourse. It means we need to start modeling our newer, better, more inclusive classics *to the public* (not just our students) at large and show its value and superior outreach potential. 13/16

And I know in writing this I am preaching to the choir. So many of the classicists I know on twitter are *already* working hard doing good public-facing work. But we need more of it and we need to be smarter about how we do it. 13/16

And of course in the end that means that hiring and tenure committees need to learn to value it - which may mean something as hopelessly crass as judging public engagement by actual reach (read: views), rather than by how it drives the #ClassicsDiscourse. 14/16

Because we all know that when it comes to jobs, public engagement doesn't 'count.' You get what you pay for. It's not the only thing that matters, but if we don't re-engage the public with our field, we're not going to be able to do any of the other things either. end/16

Addendum: And to my long-suffering twitter followers I promise I will now lay off of the interminable Classics Discourse (tm) for a bit.