There is lots of pleasant sort of (made up example) 'How I learned to love gardening through Vergil' stuff (plus ClassicsDiscourse). But if you look at public-facing enthusiasts who do reach the public (in part because they have to), that's mostly not what they're doing? 2/16
-
-
To be clear, that doesn't mean we need necessarily more
#ClassicsDiscourse. It means we need to start modeling our newer, better, more inclusive classics *to the public* (not just our students) at large and show its value and superior outreach potential. 13/16Näytä tämä ketju -
And I know in writing this I am preaching to the choir. So many of the classicists I know on twitter are *already* working hard doing good public-facing work. But we need more of it and we need to be smarter about how we do it. 13/16
Näytä tämä ketju -
And of course in the end that means that hiring and tenure committees need to learn to value it - which may mean something as hopelessly crass as judging public engagement by actual reach (read: views), rather than by how it drives the
#ClassicsDiscourse. 14/16Näytä tämä ketju -
Because we all know that when it comes to jobs, public engagement doesn't 'count.' You get what you pay for. It's not the only thing that matters, but if we don't re-engage the public with our field, we're not going to be able to do any of the other things either. end/16
Näytä tämä ketju -
Addendum: And to my long-suffering twitter followers I promise I will now lay off of the interminable Classics Discourse (tm) for a bit.
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.