Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
All of this is in service to the notion that Apuleius was really writing a book about animal rights which...I have my doubts. Especially if apparently the only way to make it work is to hacksaw off every part of the work which doesn't fit that thesis. 11/14
But my real question is why a "new and open forum for Classics" thought that running a 1300 word ad for what is essentially a bowdlerized version of a key classical text by a non-Classicist (and not the classically trained translator) was worth their digital pixels. 12/14
And that is of course before one gets into the considerable controversy behind the fellow himself which one might think, given the manifest paucity of the inducement of the paper itself, would have been enough to warn @AntigoneJournal off.
Was there really nothing better? 13/14
Why, @AntigoneJournal, it profits a journal nothing to give its reputation for the whole world.
But for Wales?
https://youtu.be/bLIsqYKDqY8?t=236 …
(My apologies to Wales and the Welsh for this likely unwelcome and demeaning comparison). end/14
Cheap publicity. Several years ago, the Getty invited the very same philosopher to give a lecture on Dürer’s rhinoceros despite his (admitted) unfamiliarity with Renaissance art, Dürer, and rhinos. (That time as well he began by confessing he hadn’t known of the piece before.)
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
words - "cut[s] out the episodes that stay from the main story...but still retaining the material that shows Apuleius' remarkably empathy for an animal..." 10/14