Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
This week, we finish looking at early modern grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV made by @PDX_Dev_Studio , examining the answers it suggests for an enduring question of the period: how did European states come to dominate much of the globe?https://acoup.blog/2021/05/28/collections-teaching-paradox-europa-universalis-iv-part-iv-why-europe/ …
We also finish rolling out the Vijayanagar-into-Bharat game that I have been using to provide screenshots, though my screenshots there end in 1750, rather than 1820 because when you are already a giant unstoppable blob, the late-late game can get kind boring.
We'll be talking about Victoria II next, though probably not immediately next week. Hopefully everyone sticks around for that, because I think the games are best 'read' together, as each one focuses on a different vision of history.
Yeah, this is the big weakness of EU4, I almost never get past the mid 1700's
And a big strength of HOI4's constrained timeframe. (Also, of course, of its framing as telling the story of a specific (set of) war(s), giving the player permission to just declare victory and quit as soon as the system stabilizes ie would become boring.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
