Panel Samuel Huntington at #SMH2021 turning into a polite bash session on political science as a discipline and I am so here for this.
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Well yeah, but political scientists have been calling balls and fouls on Huntington's use of data, in many of his works, for decades, so I'm not sure how this is a failure of the *discipline*.
So to be clear, the panel was discussing Soldier and the State (1957) not Clash (1996); my sense is that the former's reputation remains better than the latter though historical criticism of SatS is not new, e.g. E.M. Coffman in JMH 55.1 (1991)
-
-
Soldier and State has been under attack in Poli Sci for about twenty years and now is more foil than anything. But yes, Clash was reviled immediately. And, doubly yes, Soldier/State has been wildly popular in democratic militaries.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.