Panel Samuel Huntington at #SMH2021 turning into a polite bash session on political science as a discipline and I am so here for this.
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Why is it always our dustbin! Get your own dustbin! And sources...maybe?
But to be clear, there's a lot of good work in the poli-sci space, but it is in part the historian's job to call balls and fouls. And we mostly call fouls, because we are grumpy by nature!
-
-
Well, you should be grumpy. I have seen historians present their work---reading their papers word by word. I'd be grump too ;)
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Well yeah, but political scientists have been calling balls and fouls on Huntington's use of data, in many of his works, for decades, so I'm not sure how this is a failure of the *discipline*.
-
So to be clear, the panel was discussing Soldier and the State (1957) not Clash (1996); my sense is that the former's reputation remains better than the latter though historical criticism of SatS is not new, e.g. E.M. Coffman in JMH 55.1 (1991)
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.