I lack the words. It's 2021, and IR theorists have spent decades doing quantitative studies on war, but have been leaving out Native Americans the whole time. The non-state dataset has been entirely meaningless. (And don't get me started on the definition of a state)https://twitter.com/ProfPaulPoast/status/1394621206222057474 …
-
-
But just leaving out conflicts between colonial powers and Native Americans from the database entirely? How does that even happen? How is that only being addressed in the Year of Our Lord 2021?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
it's totally a visibility thing. Look at the 3 sources they used. They are U.S. (i.e. post 1789) centric
-
I just think about the sort of raw gibberish you'd get trying to do this to Rome. You'd have a TON of small wars from 218 to 167 and then a huge drop-off from 167 till 90 or so which would be almost entirely a function of "those books of Livy are lost"
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.