Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
let's say the students reject that, let's say they embrace the view that trade benefits all parties-- then you can ask the students, okay, where does that leave the resource curse? where does that leave (the catastrophe in) west africa? what mechanics would simulate that?
Exactly right. I think a better designed trade system could at least raise interesting questions, but the Europe-wins-by-default beggar-thy-neighbor system that EU4 uses isn't, I think, good at raising those questions. Vicky2's system is much more interesting (but also janky)
i mean this is genuinely a hot take but there's a tension here between the impulse towards "an accurate simulation of the underlying mechanics," "mostly emulates actual history," and "the player has absolute control over a state"
because with an accurate simulation of the mechanics and the player's total foresight of them, it might be possible for states to speedrun the tech tree sprint for those key developments that do in fact wildly alter the balance of trade (e.g. the flintlock), then run with them
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
