So, funny story but I met my wife in a medieval (yes, not ancient) history class because we were both the sort of nerds that would chat with the professor afterwards and the first conversation we had was about the use of halberds and other large polearms.https://twitter.com/CSMFHT/status/1392552522011725831 …
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
I’m afraid you have put yourself in the frame for a DnD-inspired question: does a halberd make sense for a warrior fighting solo or in a small group, or does it only really work in battlefield formations?
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 5 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @edin_thinker
Most polearms are designed for use in formation, but apart from perhaps pikes, nearly all of them have use in a small group as well. If you want to look through the sources on this stuff, check out the Wiktenauer (https://wiktenauer.com/ )
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 8 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @edin_thinker
Honestly, even just having a normal battlefield loadout would be an improvement for most DnD characters. In my experience, the average DnD fighter carries both too many weapons and too few weapons.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @edin_thinker
As in you have a heavy-armored combatant and he's got a dagger and a sword and a mace and a bow and an axe and a shield. Which is 4 sidearms and no primary weapon. Where is his spear?
3 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 6 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @edin_thinker
What would the “primary weapon” for a heavy-armored combatant generally look like? Would it mostly be spears and polearms?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BrennanBartley ja @edin_thinker
Mostly spears and polearms yes. Swords were typically backup weapons (Romans unusual in this regard). Two-handed swords were often primary weapons but hand-and-a-half swords were generally backups (including longsword and katana).
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 7 tykkäystä -
How did Romans fought Cavalry with their short swords?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
Shock cavalry? A deep, solid block of infantry which holds its ground can repel cavalry without spears. Infantry is denser and horses cannot trample a dense mass of men; when the horseman stops, he's facing attack from all sides and unable to turn.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @snk_xed ja
More likely the rider in question chose not to commit near-certain suicide and, realizing the infantry is not breaking to flee, turns aside before impact.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 3 tykkäystä -
Does lances solve this problem for cavalry? The cavalry can engage a solid blow at range while turning at the last moment?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä - Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.