Everett Wheeler seems to have invented the word "Lehnstuhlfeldherr" just so he could throw it at me in his obscenely nasty review of my bookhttps://twitter.com/NatalieZed/status/1391150397922889739 …
-
To be fair, the critiques were very helpful in thinking about the prospectus and the project. If there is a weakness in your argument, Wheeler will find it. But those critiques were delivered - to my face - in the traditional Wheeler manner.
I honestly find myself torn by Wheeler. On the one hand, his manner is very brusque and occasionally his critiques have a harshness I think steps over the line. On the other hand, there is a reward to be had for tolerating that brusqueness, given his mastery of the topics.
-
-
I assure you there is no reward in tolerating the viciousness of this review. In more than 5000 words of deliberate distortions and cruel invective I found perhaps 3 or 4 minor points (biblio entries, etc) that I could actually work with.
-
Given that context I think "occasionally his critiques have a harshness I think steps over the line" is protecting the critic to the point of dishonesty. His critiques are made outright useless by their consistent and outrageously excessive harshness, if not cruelty.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.