Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
His understanding of the late Roman army and the place of the Foederati in it is, as you'd expect, centuries out of date. Archaeology has done a lot to change our understanding of some of these institutions and their changes, but by virtue of writing before...
...the entire discipline of archaeology existed, Gibbon is robbed of the ability to take advantage of it. That also robs him of the ability to make any sense of the economic decline of the empire because, relying on the literary sources, he doesn't know when it happened...
...which is a real problem because it seems to have begun under the Five Good Emperors in the second century, which also places it well before widespread Christian influence on Roman culture.
There's more, but I am going to assume that is enough to give a general impression. Instead of Gibbon, read D. Potter, The Roman Empire at Bay (2004), R. Mathisen, Roman Aristocrats in Barbarian Gaul (1993), G. Halsall, Barbarian Migrations and the Roman West (2007)...
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
