Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I enjoy it too, though I prefer conquering and developing/building manufactories, and likely find it limiting for the same reasons you do - though mostly for me it's that the end nodes are too historically deterministic. Bravo for figuring out trade in India tho, I never have!
If you lock down Coromandel and Gujarat, you can own all of the trade moving west from East Asia and India, which is a huge portion of global trade; more than enough to subsist a big trade presence. It's not as good as an end-node, but as a bottleneck, it's one of the best.
You can end up with S. E. Asia, S. China, the Phillipines, Indonesia, etc. all piling their trade through your mega-bottleneck in Coromandel. Use merchants, ships and territorial outposts to ensure flow from the origin points.
And unlike the end-nodes, you can easily be the only real trade presence in Coromandel, so you get all of it. Lock down the Malacca node and you can also lock the Europeans out of East Asian trade entirely since you have both bottlenecks.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
I'd also be happy to talk with you about the game from the perspective of a history grad student who has played the game since its release :-)
Curious and respectable! I'm finishing up what I hope will be my first world conquest as Burgundy->Lotharingia, with a very healthy Leonese march based in Venezuela 