Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
This is actually just a really good reference list, especially for folks heading into grad school for whom these abbreviations, many common in scholarship, may be unusual or confusing and sometimes difficult to look up.https://twitter.com/MerriamWebster/status/1390340584016162819 …
Blog readers will note I am a stickler with Ibid., loc. cit. and op. cit. I generally avoid Ibid. and I think it shouldn't be used unless it is..well, ibidem - in the *very* same place - same work, same author, same page. I tend to think Ibid. followed by qualifiers is wrong.
But on the blog, I will use Author, op. cit., <page> when the work in question is in a leading bibliography note at the front of the post. I actually do not use op. cit. or loc. cit. or Ibid. in my scholarly writing unless required by style guides, but others do, of course.
Thank you! This is very helpful!
suggested additions: 'q. v.' — quod vide — "which see" (and plural qq. vv. — quae vide) 'et pass.' — et passim — "and throughout"
I'd also like to see them add both contra and pace. Pace in particular, I think, can be practically unintelligible to the reader who doesn't know Latin; it's meaning is often impossible to derive from context.
I was once reading a scientific paper about visualization approaches and started googling to find the cool software package they used. It turns out "Vide Infra" is really hard to find if you stop reading the paper and look for it online.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
