Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I agree with the comparison (though as you said, Napoleon was better at governing). People have an odd tendency to equate people who are good at killing to people who are worthy of admiration and emulation.
On the flip-side, you have truly difficult figures like Octavian. Ruthless and violent during the civil wars, but then a capable, even generous and careful administrator of the empire. Look one way and you want to burn him in effigy, the other way and he deserves statues.
I am always shocked when reading about Octavian and Augustus. Its as if they were two different people. On the topic of people having military feats considered great for their conquests, what do you think about Trajan?
Expanding into Dacia was foolish.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
