Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
It discusses the handling of elephants from the position of a battlefield commander, not a mahout. Like chariots, kings rode *on* elephants, they did not drive them. It's been a while, but as I recall, the Arthasatra doesn't include detailed information on even basic things...
...like the dietary requirements of elephants (except that starving them is bad), their handling, mating cycles, their capture (except 'from the elephant forests' which, yes) or training. It's not that kind of work, so I'm not surprised it doesn't discuss inducing musth.
Hmm, fair. I still feel that this may be tangential, as it seems like it's reasonable evidence to suggest it happened in India, but somewhat distant from the Greek evidence and I worry about over-emphasising the 
answers
I suppose I find myself thinking that if Trautmann thinks its at least plausible then it probably isn't 'false' even if we might not say it is confirmed. I mean, don't get me wrong - the Greek source tradition is thin and it sure seems a bit crazy of a thing to do!
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
