Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Lots of things are plausible, and I guess I just don't see anything in the argument you present here to suggest that wine would have the effect you suggest and that we should believe it happened when the Greek evidence for it is weak.
So, the Arthashastra is a manual on statecraft and strategy, not on the control of elephants. It has more in common with the Book of Lord Shang than with Xenophon's On Horsemanship. Elephant handling was done by trained specialists, not by kings.
It discusses the handling of elephants from the position of a battlefield commander, not a mahout. Like chariots, kings rode *on* elephants, they did not drive them. It's been a while, but as I recall, the Arthasatra doesn't include detailed information on even basic things...
...like the dietary requirements of elephants (except that starving them is bad), their handling, mating cycles, their capture (except 'from the elephant forests' which, yes) or training. It's not that kind of work, so I'm not surprised it doesn't discuss inducing musth.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
