Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Musth is an easily observable state because elephants discharge temporin from ducts on either side of their head during musth - you can *see* if an elephant is in this state. Trautmann (2015) compiles quite a few examples where these secretions...
...are associated with war elephants in an ideal state for battle; the aggression was prized even though it made the elephants extremely difficult to handle. It is thus little surprise that there is evidence for the use of diet, training and even intoxication...
...to try to induce this state (as an aside, 'musth' itself derives from an Urdu word meaning 'drunk' so the association with intoxication is in the etymology). So I suppose here I find the possibility of efforts to induce musth chemically at least plausible...
...and it fits with an apparent stated preference in Indian armies to attack with elephants in musth when possible.
What I do not think we know is if any of these concoctions actually worked to induce musth, though given that the state is visible, maybe? 
In any event, this is a claim that I think I'd move from 'False' to at least the shrug-emoji of 'we don't really know.' I get the impression of implausibility, but there does seem to be evidence for similar practices in India.https://www.badancient.com/claims/drunk-war-elephants/ …
All of this, I should note, is from T. Trautmann, Elephants and Kings (2015). You can read my broader thoughts on the purpose and social place of war elephants here:https://acoup.blog/2019/07/26/collections-war-elephants-part-i-battle-pachyderms/ …
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
