To be clear, slavery was bad. It was bad in 'Biblical times' (I really hate that phrase - it implies that Biblical events occurred in some mystical legendary time, rather than mostly happening within the historical period), it was bad in antiquity, it was always bad.https://twitter.com/DavidLarter/status/1389316195359281169 …
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Just to fill in the 'Biblical times' bit - avoiding the historical accuracy question, by the book of Joshua we're clearly reading events at least *set* in the historical period (c. 1300, during the Late Bronze Age Collapse, probably), though written much later.
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 33 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Like, this stuff is old, but not 'mists of myth and legends' old. King Hezekiah (from 2nd kings and 2nd chronicles) would have been a near-contemporary of Greek author Hesiod and younger than Homer. The Kingdom of Judah fell during the time of the Athenian politician Solon.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 45 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
And to be clear, written history goes *further* back in the Levant than in Greece or Rome. Like, WAY further back. We have a decent sense of the political situation in the Levant from the early 2000s BC onward, centuries *before* Exodus would have been set.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 35 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Assyrian court records from the period attest to the existence of the kingdoms of Israel and Judah and detail Assyrian military activity there. Like, check it out, the Assyrians made a stele where they record besieging Jerusalem in 701:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sennacherib%27s_Annals …
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 34 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
And of course the New Testament is set during the period of the Roman Empire. So don't say 'Biblical times,' say 'Iron Age Levant' if you mean the most of the Old Testament, say 'Hellenistic Period' if you mean Maccabees and 'Roman period' if you mean the New Testament.
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 54 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Also slavery is bad, will be bad, and has always been bad. It was not, at any point, good. It was bad. Yes, even in the Iron Age Levant. Bad. Thank you for coming to my TED talk.
5 vastausta 2 uudelleentwiittausta 95 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
It's really interesting because, if memory serves, I believe the Romans were notorious for taking lots of prisoners and enslaving them. Which, from the descriptions, seemed to be really bad. Plus I seen that Russell Crowe movie.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä
Indeed! Being conquered and forced into slavery by the Romans was very bad! They were often brutal, enslaved people had no rights and suffered complete social death. And that was pretty much the norm for Mediterranean slavery. It was, and I must stress this again, very bad!
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @DavidLarter
Though, you know, the Russel Crowe movie was very good (a bit dodgy on the history, but good nonetheless)!
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.