Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I don't know the system in Greece today well, but I know Anglophone scholars who regard ancient historians as just philologists who read Livy instead of Lucan and, that may have worked in the 50s, but the field and methods for ancient history are too complex for that today.
Yes, I read Latin and Greek. But to do my research, that's not enough. I need to be conversant in military science (strategy, terminology), economic analysis, demographic analysis, material culture and comparative historical perspectives outside of the ancient Mediterranean.
Expecting - as again, I have encountered some people who do expect - me to master all of that while going through the same philological training as people who *only* research philology (and sometimes have embarrassingly poor grasp of even the basics of ancient history) is nuts.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
because same thing here.
Classics Departments, either stop expecting archaeologists, ancient historians, etc. to demonstrate Greek and Latin teaching in job applications, or give those grad students chances to teach them before they get the PhD.
