Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Two things jump out at me from the GWU report. 1) They stick to arrests, which selects out Ashli Babbitt, who did not live long enough to be arrested. I get why, methodologically, but given the small numbers they're working with, it makes a meaningful difference.
2) the difference in branches of the service, while it could be many factors and correlation != causation, it strikes me that 'warrior-ism' is strongest in the Marines and the Army and those branches were the most represented. Curious, but obviously not dispositive in any way.
In your thread, I think you make a good point about combat experience not being nearly so big an indicator as the media made it out to be. Of course, as a Roman historian, I'd be remiss if I didn't note that the praetorians seem to have rarely had combat experience either...
I think his point about combat experience not being a factor tracks with the study in TSNR that you posted. Therein, the authors point out that the less experienced were more likely to posit feelings of superiority.
Yes, I have some thoughts about why marines are overrepresented, and if *not deploying* plays some role in pushing the desire for action some other way, and it may come out in a future story
I'll look out for it.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
