Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
There is also a surprisingly strong Zama-Truther movement online, although it does not map onto current wing-nut trends as closely.
Wait, what? How does Zama-Trutherism even work? Do they think that Carthage actually won the Second Punic War?
Big if true.
It’s weird. The basic argument is the war ended without a big battle, and then Scipio made up Zama to glorify himself and Polybius parroted his lies.
Sort of conspiracy theory masquerading as source criticism.
No, the thesis is that Hannibal was too awesome to be defeated. @DrMichaelJTayl1 wrote against it in @ancientwarfare
Oh gods. This is like the Spartan-adoration thing, isn't it? I guess classical history has that intoxicating mix of high general familiarity, well-developed world-building and gaps in the sources that can attract the kind who want to 'stan rather than understand
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
rams!
