I think this is probably correct and the long-term implications if the two-tiered model of academia continues will be quite negative. 'not punching down' isn't enough - the existence of such a sharp 'down' in the community of scholars is a problem in and of itself.https://twitter.com/whsieh/status/1381700436109967372 …
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Obviously even if all jobs were TT, there'd be status distinctions between institutions. But the adjunct/TT divide is much wider and impacts many more things in a greater variety of ways.
1 vastaus 2 uudelleentwiittausta 15 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
Part of the problem is in principle senior academics should be able to criticize the ideas of junior scholars that they disagree with. But especially in social media this is hard to do, especially when the junior person is in precarious circumstances. It’s terrible all around.
3 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @whsieh ja @BretDevereaux
Yeah. "Don't punch down" has come to mean "never criticize the ideas of a junior scholar, because it might mean that they don't get a job." I personally don't want everyone to pretend my work is good if it isn't. That's not helping me become a better scholar.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @cwjones89 ja @whsieh
Right - the universe where scholars can critique each other without the worry - or real ability - to cost the other a job is just a much more valuable and effective field. Probably more collegial too, since the stakes are lower.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @cwjones89
I agree with most of that. Although “collegiality” is over rated. And even in the past when the job market wasn’t so broken, academics could still be nasty with each other. The reality is lots of academics always have and always will be genuine jerks.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
I’ve heard a decent number of stories of epic conference explosions going back decades—and even was part of one myself. I still think they are mostly hilarious, but largely because all the participants were ladder faculty.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys
I once saw my advisor just disassemble a conference paper in the Q&A before a crowded room. It was a thing to behold - but I know he only felt OK to do it because 1) the paper had bad flaws but also 2) the scholar in question was ladder faculty.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @whsieh
I have seen grad students get politely but utterly destroyed at conferences. But that was their fault for coming to major conferences with crap papers (and also their advisers' fault for letting them do that - but that's another issue).
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystäKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.