Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
The value of a written alliance is that it imposes greater costs for failure to live up to the terms of the arrangement. This is obviously not a perfect system and countries do breach treaties but reliability and credibility also matter.
One need only look at the relative difference in current affairs between Ukraine and the Baltic states (Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia) to see the value in having a formal mutual defense treaty rather than an informal understanding.
I don't disagree; but I feel like there's an obvious level here that we lack robust and accurate language to describe. Saudi arabia may not have a formal defense agreement but it would beggar belief to say that they aren't under US protection. That can change rapidly, but still
The traditional term for that is 'client state' or 'vassal state' but one may readily understand why the state department tries to avoid that phrasing.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
