Pet Peeve of mine: using the term "US Ally" for states that are not in fact US Allies under any formal treaty arrangement. We occasionally work with all sorts of countries. Sometimes we engage in military cooperation with them in pursuit of our interests... 1/6
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
...but we have *actual treaty obligations* to a much smaller number. I see in particular a lot of 'US Ally Does Human Rights Violation!' stories where the country in question isn't a treaty ally and the USA has no formal obligations to them. 2/6
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 17 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Now those stories are valid, important stories - there are some relationships that the USA might want to reconsider in light of the human rights violations going on. But the transactional informality of those relationships is an important point that gets elided. 3/6
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 19 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Anyway, there are two fair ways to count US allies. Option 1: Add NATO + State department designated Major non-NATO ally (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_non-NATO_ally …). Option 2: Actually look at which states the USA has treaty obligations to defend. 4/6
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 13 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
For option two, you have NATO (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO ), ANZUS (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANZUS ), the Rio Pact (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inter-American_Treaty_of_Reciprocal_Assistance …), plus bilateral obligations with Japan, the Philippines, and South Korea. Israel, Pakistan and Taiwan are less clear-cut but probably included. 5/6
3 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 12 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
So no, Ethiopia is not a US ally, neither is Saudi Arabia, Ukraine, etc. It's fine to describe those countries as friendly, or cooperative or what have you - and argue that the USA ought to be more critical of them - but they are not formal allies and that matters. end/6
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 25 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
Ethiopia and the US are part of a bilateral defense committee, but this is pure DOD/Exec branch relations.https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Releases/Release/Article/2032402/readout-of-us-ethiopia-bilateral-defense-committee/ …
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @PeterCorless ja @BretDevereaux
Ukraine is being fast-tracked through Congress now for a security partnership act. https://www.foreign.senate.gov/press/chair/release/bipartisan-group-of-senators-re-introduce-legislation-to-provide-assistance-support-for-ukraine …
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
I think it is important to distinguish here between treaties that *could* exist but don't and dialogue channels though. Russia is, after all, in the NATO 'Partnership for Peace' despite being, you know, NATO's primary strategic foe.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.