Do you have a blog post on this? Because if you don't I *really* want you to write it. I'm sure a lot of it is really boring, but it's pretty cool that you took your chance to put into (virtual) practice the organizational lessons you've studied as part of your career.https://twitter.com/BretDevereaux/status/1378182595566043136 …
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @surcomplicated
Kind of the other order, actually. I played EVE as an undergraduate, before I really delved into military history or strategic theory. That said, there isn't nothing to the connection. Run fleets in EVE and you will understand why doctrine and cohesion matter.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 7 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
There's probably some fun opsec misadventures in there as well: EVE has a reputation for cutthroat behavior, so traitors must be an ever-present worry.
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @surcomplicated
Funny thing, on my big surprise attack campaign, I had several pages of contingency plans for what we'd do if we didn't achieve surprise because I assumed there'd be a leak (we were a very leaky alliance).
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @surcomplicated
And uh, we caught them napping. They spotted us just a couple jumps out, had all of four people on the gate when we showed up (with 400+ ships). Their cyno-blocker went down before they could get a rep online to discuss surrender terms.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä
I was stunned, because they had been raiding us for weeks and so I assumed they had spies and those spies, on seeing a big op planned with no clear destination, would guess they had to be the target...but nope.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.