For another actual historian's take on Sparta see @BretDevereauxhttps://acoup.blog/2019/08/16/collections-this-isnt-sparta-part-i-spartan-school/ …
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @DjangoWexler, @MykeCole ja
that movie was made in hollywood i am not using it as reference we need to be clear on that
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @unit_099, @DjangoWexler ja
The linked post (it's my linked post) is not a discussion of 300, but a discussion of the Spartans. I'm an ancient historian, with a doctorate. I cite my sources throughout that series.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 7 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @unit_099 ja
Bret Devereaux uudelleentwiittasi unit99
In any case, your comments at the top of the thread (https://twitter.com/unit_099/status/1374884091838005252 …) are just wrong. Herodotus is our nearest, bestsource and he is very clear that the allied Greek plan was to force a decisive engagement at Thermopylae which would win and hold the pass indefinitely.
Bret Devereaux lisäsi,
unit99 @unit_099Vastauksena käyttäjälle @MykeColevery poor choice of words the stories from battle of Thermopylae have lived for millennia, yet you compare it to a Hollywood movie from a few years ago? the battle was a strategic mission the outcome led to Xerxes losses if you don't believe that then you are delusional1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 8 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @unit_099 ja
That operational objective clearly was not met. The Allied Greek army was defeated, the Spartan contingent was destroyed and as a direct consequence, Athens was sacked and Thebes surrendered. It was a strategic and operational disaster.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 6 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @unit_099 ja
Herodotus is clear on this point, noting that (Hdt. 7.206.2) "They [the Spartans], not expecting the war at Thermopylae to be decided so quickly, sent only the advanced force." You can actually puzzle out how foolish this was if you work out the dates.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @unit_099 ja
The Carneia doesn't seem to have been over before the battle (Herodotus speaks of Spartan intentions to leave Sparta, but not them actually leaving (Hdt. 7.206.1)). But by road, Thermopylae is more than 150 miles from Sparta. At least ten days marching.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 3 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @unit_099 ja
So Leonidas' problem is 'how do I hold the pass for 15+ days before my army arrives' and he managed...three days. Not a great plan.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @DjangoWexler ja
we can assume and play out the plan in endless scenarios 2500 years later and exactly to your point he was brave enough to go knowing clearly he would die yet the outcome is the same his stand helped Themistocles win that is the history and that is the point
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @unit_099, @DjangoWexler ja
Except that he did *not* know that he would clearly die. Our sources are clear on this point: Thermopylae was not a suicide mission. It was an attempt at a decisive, victorious engagement. All 300 Spartans expected to go home at the end and 298 of them did not.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 3 tykkäystä
And the stand at Thermopylae didn't meaningfully hinder Xerxes. The losses were not significant and week long delay (Xerxes didn't attack immediately) didn't matter in anyone's plans. Thermopylae didn't actually accomplish any key operational objective.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.