Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I'm also aware that the whole bit about titles is different for balding white men (read: me) than everyone else. It is *easy* for white male instructors to dispense with titles, because society accords us respect anyway.
And so in some ways I think that the folks who drop Dr. - in my own experience, almost universally white male instructors - are unintentionally (to be clear, I think they have good motives) benefiting from a privilege their non-white or non-male colleagues do not have.
Consequently - if I can sound *truly* out of touch - maintaining some vestige of the 'dignity of the degree' and using the title with undergraduates might help give cover to non-white and non-male instructors to do the same as a way of asserting their authority in the classroom.
In that it lets all of us - the community of PhD-havers - define our authority formally and collectively, in a way that everyone can take part in, rather than falling back on informal social status expectations which I may benefit from, but my colleagues may not.
Not going to lie, I'm really happy you said this. I struggle with this and therefore, I ask, what will I want my title to be moving forward? Do I take what was earned and use it, or do I discontinue the tradition? There should be a conference about this...
I would recommend to start take what was earned. You deserve it and it can help a lot - especially at the start
Agreed
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
For my part, with (undergraduate) students I prefer Dr. <Lastname>. I think preferences here often come down to attitudes about hierarchy and status distinction.